Tag Archives: outdoor cordless loudspeakers

Points To Realize About Cordless Loudspeaker Power Efficiency

Current wireless speakers will naturally squander some amount of power they use up. Picking pair of cordless speakers with high power efficiency can lower the amount of squandered power. I will talk about some little-known facts about power efficiency that will help you select the ideal product.

A fairly high amount of energy is radiated as heat when you get a pair of low-efficiency wireless loudspeakers. This can produce quite a few issues: Cordless loudspeakers that have low power efficiency are going to squander a great amount of energy. It’s smart to keep in mind the additional power cost while choosing between a high- and low-efficiency model. The wasted energy is radiated by the bluetooth speakers as heat. To safeguard the circuit elements, low-efficiency cordless loudspeakers must find ways to get rid of the heat that’s created. Commonly additional components must be included to dissipate adequate power and preserve the optimum running temperature. These components usually are heat sinks along with fans. These heat sinks use up a good amount of space and make the cordless speakers large and heavy. Additionally, they add to the cost of the cordless loudspeakers. Low-efficiency cordless speakers further need a great deal of circulation around the cordless speakers. Therefore they can not be placed in close spaces or inside air-tight enclosures.

Low-efficiency products require more total power in order to output the identical level of audio power as high-efficiency models. As a result they require a larger power source which makes the wireless speakers more expensive to make. Further, due to the large level of heat, there will be considerably higher thermal stress on the electric elements and internal materials which may cause reliability complications. In comparison, high-efficiency wireless speakers can be made small and light.

While looking for a pair of wireless speakers, you can find the efficiency in the data sheet. This figure is usually shown as a percentage. Class-A amplifiers are among the least efficient and provide a power efficiency of approximately 25% only. In contrast, switching amps, often known as “Class-D” amps deliver efficiencies as high as 98%. The larger the efficiency figure, the less the amount of energy squandered as heat. A 100-Watt amp which has a 50% efficiency will have an energy usage of 200 Watts. What’s less known about efficiency is the fact that this figure isn’t fixed. The truth is it fluctuates depending on how much energy the amp offers. Therefore at times you will discover efficiency values for several power levels in the data sheet. Amps have larger efficiency while supplying greater output power than when working at small power because of the fixed power that they use up irrespective of the output power. The efficiency value in the amp data sheet is typically provided for the greatest amplifier output power.

The measurement setup of amp power efficiency uses a power resistor that is attached to the amplifier. The amp itself is being fed a constant-envelope sine-wave tone. Next the energy absorbed by the resistor is tested and divided by the energy the amp consumes. To obtain a complete efficiency profile, the audio power of the amplifier is swept between several values. At each value the efficiency is tested and then plotted onto a graph.

While switching (Class-D) amps possess amongst the greatest efficiency, they have a tendency to possess larger sound distortion than analog music amplifiers and smaller signal-to-noise ratio. As a result you are going to have to weigh the size of the cordless loudspeakers against the sound fidelity. Then again, digital amps have come a long way and are offering improved music fidelity than ever before. Wireless speakers which employ Class-T amps come close to the music fidelity of products which have analog amplifiers. Due to this fact selecting a set of wireless loudspeakers which employ switching amplifier with good audio fidelity is now feasible.